Voting in legislative elections under plurality rule
نویسنده
چکیده
Conventional models of single district plurality elections show that with three parties anything can happen extreme policies can win regardless of voter preferences. I show that when there are multiple district elections for a legislature we get back to a world where the median voter matters: an extreme policy will generally only come about if it is preferred by the median voter in a majority of districts, while the existence of a centrist party can lead to moderate outcomes even if the party itself wins few seats. Furthermore, I show that while single district elections always have misaligned voting i.e. some voters do not vote for their preferred choice, equilibria of the legislative election exist with no misaligned voting in any district. Finally, I show that when parties are impatient, a fixed rule on how legislative bargaining occurs will lead to more coalition governments, while uncertainty will favour single party governments.
منابع مشابه
Sophisticated approval voting, ignorance priors, and plurality heuristics: a behavioral social choice analysis in a Thurstonian framework.
This project reconciles historically distinct paradigms at the interface between individual and social choice theory, as well as between rational and behavioral decision theory. The authors combine a utility-maximizing prescriptive rule for sophisticated approval voting with the ignorance prior heuristic from behavioral decision research and two types of plurality heuristics to model approval v...
متن کاملRobust Political Equilibria under Plurality and Runoff Rule∗
A central problem for the game theoretic analysis of voting is that voting games have very many Nash equilibria. In this paper, we consider a new refinement concept for voting games that combines two ideas that appear reasonable for voting games: First, trembling hand perfection (voters sometimes make mistakes when casting their vote) and second, coordination of voters with similar interests. W...
متن کاملThe Random Pairs Voting Rule: Introduction and Evaluation With a Large Dataset
This paper introduces and evaluates the Random Pairs voting rule to show that it significantly improves upon the communication complexity of balloting methods requiring complete orderings of candidates while maintaining a high Condorcet efficiency. To this end, Random Pairs is compared to plurality, 2-approval, Borda, and range voting on elections constructed from Yahoo! users’ ratings of music...
متن کاملVoting by Adaptive Agents in Multi-Candidate Elections
Here we investigate how strategic adaptation changes our understanding and predictions of voting systems. We model populations of agents voting in multiple elections over time that revise their voting strategies based on electoral outcomes. Using this framework we examine the dynamic formation of electoral outcomes. Allowing agents to adapt their strategies refines the predictions of rational c...
متن کاملFrugal Bribery in Voting
Bribery in elections is an important problem in computational social choice theory. We introduce and study two important special cases of the classical $BRIBERY problem, namely, FRUGAL-BRIBERY and FRUGAL-$BRIBERY where the briber is frugal in nature. By this, we mean that the briber is only able to influence voters who benefit from the suggestion of the briber. More formally, a voter is vulnera...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- J. Economic Theory
دوره 166 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016